BYU men’s tennis hosts the 2026 ITA Mountain Regional Championships from Tuesday, Oct. 6 through Saturday, Oct. 10 in Provo. There is no published television, stream or radio listing, and the official schedules still mark the start time TBA. The ITA tournament page is the right place to look for draws and results as they appear.
That answer is less convenient than a channel and first serve, but it is honest. BYU has published the five-day Mountain date window and Provo location. It has not published a specific court site, daily order of play, admission policy or player entry list. The schedule’s stored Tuesday timestamp is paired with an authoritative time_tba marker, so it should not be converted into a made-up 10 a.m. start.
This is also not a BYU-versus-ITA dual match. The Mountain Regional is an individual singles and doubles tournament. One Cougar can advance while another is eliminated, and a deep doubles run has its own bracket life. Follow names and pairings, not a team score.
BYU ITA Mountain Regionals follow information
| Event detail | Information |
|---|---|
| Event | 2026 ITA Mountain Regional Championships |
| Mountain dates | Tuesday, Oct. 6 through Saturday, Oct. 10, 2026 |
| Daily start times | TBA; BYU’s official record retains the time_tba marker |
| Location | Provo, Utah; a specific venue has not been published |
| TV/stream | No official broadcast or stream published |
| Radio | No official radio listing published |
| Draws/results | Official ITA Mountain tournament page |
| Admission | Not published |
| Official BYU event | Schedule record 25475 |
| Permanent schedule | BYU men’s tennis schedule |
Fans planning to attend should check the BYU schedule and ITA event page again before leaving. “Provo” is not a gate address, and a five-day tournament does not mean every Cougar plays every day. A draw and order of play can answer both questions. Until they exist, the missing details are unannounced rather than free, canceled or hidden behind a stream.
Why this tournament carries more weight than the September trips
BYU’s first fall weekend split six players between the Dar Walters Classic in Boise and the Sherwood Collegiate Cup in California. Those events supplied useful match evidence. Regionals add elimination pressure and a national pathway.
The ITA lists BYU as the Mountain host and sets the standard Division I regional structure at a 64-player singles main draw, a 64-player singles qualifying draw and a 64-team doubles main draw. The national regional program produces NCAA singles and doubles qualifiers. The published ITA page does not yet assign BYU players to a draw or promise that every rostered Cougar will enter.
That distinction matters. September pool play can give a player another match after a loss. A regional bracket eventually stops offering second chances. The question shifts from “What did BYU learn?” to “Who can keep winning when each round removes half the path?”
BYU knows the difference because it won this tournament’s doubles title last year. Adam Chodur and Otto Schreiner beat Utah’s Jett Potter and Dylan Relic 4-6, 7-6, 10-8 in the final. Their run included an 8-7 quarterfinal and a three-set semifinal. Four straight narrow rounds turned a fall pairing into a regional championship.
That title is the standard, not a prediction. Chodur and Schreiner have not been announced as a 2026 entry, and BYU has not published any doubles pairs. The useful carryover is the shape of the task: survive short-margin doubles, then do it again against opponents who have already survived their side of the bracket.
The pairing decision starts with Schreiner
Schreiner is the returning half of the championship team, which makes his partner the first draw detail worth finding. Last year’s regional result shows what BYU had: a pair that won four main-draw matches, including three rounds decided by two games, a tiebreak or a match tiebreak.
His September trip to Boise was rougher. BYU’s official result lists three singles losses, but two were competitive: Michigan State’s Max Biss needed a match tiebreak after Schreiner won the second set 6-1, and Boise State’s Filippo Tallakson closed a 7-6 second set with an 8-6 tiebreak. Those are losses, full stop. They also identify the exact regional problem. Schreiner has already been close enough to force late-set execution; now he needs to finish it.
BYU can keep part of last year’s champion pair together if Chodur enters, build around Schreiner with another veteran, or use the home regional to test a new combination. None of those choices is confirmed. The draw will say more than a roster page can.
Goldammer gets another shot at the round-of-16 wall
Tygen Goldammer reached the regional singles round of 16 last year. He opened the main draw with a 6-0, 6-2 win, beat Denver’s Ryoma Mishiro 6-0, 4-6, 6-0, then lost to UNLV’s Illia Maksymchuk 6-4, 2-6, 6-4.
That is a useful baseline because it is specific. Goldammer was not merely “competitive.” He won two rounds and took the third set against the player who ended his run. Moving deeper this year would require converting the same kind of match that stopped him.
His Sherwood results point in both directions. USC’s Connor Church beat him 6-4, 6-3. Goldammer answered with a 6-2, 6-0 win over Pacific’s Jonty Giesen. The rebound was clean, but a regional bracket will not give him the luxury of using one loss to set up the next day. His first tight set matters immediately.
Doubles has a similar warning. BYU’s published Sherwood scores show Goldammer and TJ Wells losing 4-2 to USC and 4-3(6) to Pacific. One routine short-set loss and one tiebreak loss are not a verdict on a veteran pair. They do make closing the next 4-all or 7-all situation a real checkpoint rather than a generic talking point.
Peranovic and Ubri have the hottest published pair
Leon Peranovic and Yubel Ubri supplied BYU’s clearest positive pairing signal at Sherwood. The official recap records a 4-1 win over USC’s Niels Hoffman and Sklar Phillips and a 4-2 win over Pacific’s Jonty Giesen and Josh Craze.
Peranovic’s singles scores were even cleaner after a three-set opening win. He beat USC’s Pablo Robledo Hoyos 6-4, 2-6, 10-7, Pacific’s Nico Rating 6-3, 6-2 and Saint Mary’s Paulo Etchecoin 6-2, 6-2. Those published results do not guarantee a regional seed, main-draw place or partnership. They do give coach Zack Warren a combination that has already won twice and a transfer who finished three listed singles matches.
Ubri split his two published Sherwood singles results, losing 6-3, 6-4 to Hoffman before beating Pacific’s Christof Schaertlin Coffey 6-2, 6-4. Pairing him with Peranovic created a better opening-weekend return than either player’s singles line alone.
That makes the regional draw revealing in two ways. If they stay together, BYU is rewarding the fall’s first clean doubles evidence. If they split, the staff may be trying to spread that energy across two pairs. Either move can make sense. Pretending the previous pairing must continue cannot.
Hasler and Wells need different kinds of response
Caden Hasler went 1-2 in BYU’s published Dar Walters singles results. His 7-5, 7-5 win over Idaho’s Mikolaj Lis showed he could close two tight sets. Michigan State’s Matias Stewart and Boise State’s Karim Ezzat then beat him 6-4, 6-4 and 7-5, 7-5. Six sets were decided by one break or less. That is a lot of useful tension and only one win.
For Hasler, the regional test is whether repeated close sets become an asset. He has already played the score pattern. Winning a qualifying or early main-draw round would require him to own the last two games instead of merely reaching them.
Wells’ published Sherwood singles scores are less symmetrical. He beat USC’s Sklar Phillips 7-6(2), 6-4, then lost 6-4, 6-2 to Pacific’s Josh Craze. The first match shows a senior finishing a tiebreak and protecting the next set. The second shows how quickly that advantage disappears against a different opponent.
Wells also sits in the middle of BYU’s doubles choice. His long partnership with Goldammer has history, while Peranovic and Ubri have the better published September result. Regionals are where the staff must decide whether familiarity or current evidence gets the first draw slot.
How to read five days without a team score
The cleanest follow routine is player based:
- Open the ITA event page and identify which BYU players are in qualifying, the main singles draw and the doubles draw.
- Record the round, opponent and full set score. “Advanced” without a score hides whether the match was routine or rescued.
- Check doubles pairings separately. A singles exit does not automatically end a player’s tournament.
- Treat a blank future round as unresolved, not a scheduled BYU match.
- Use BYU Athletics for recap corrections and the ITA bracket for the live tournament path.
The first useful milestone is main-draw survival. The second is the round of 16, where Goldammer and Schreiner stopped last year in singles. Doubles carries the defending-title reference, but the field does not owe BYU the same draw or finish because the tournament moved to Provo.
Home court helps in obvious ways: no travel, familiar conditions and a local crowd if attendance details are published. It does not shorten a 64-player bracket. BYU still has to solve players from the Mountain field one round at a time.
What comes next
BYU’s schedule next lists the SMU Invitational in Dallas from Oct. 29-31, followed by ITA Masters and ITA Sectional Championships on Nov. 5. Who reaches those November pathways depends on qualification and selection rules beyond a single schedule row, so do not turn a strong regional run into an automatic destination unless the ITA or BYU confirms it.
For now, the assignment is narrower. Find the draw. Find Schreiner’s doubles partner. See whether Goldammer can move beyond last year’s round of 16, whether Peranovic and Ubri stay together, and whether Hasler can turn another 7-5 set into a bracket step.
The schedule gives BYU five days at home. The bracket will tell us who uses them.
Sources and further reading
- BYU Athletics: official event record 25475 for the stable ID, Oct. 6-10 UTC window, Provo location, scheduled status and authoritative
time_tbamarker. - BYU Athletics: 2026-27 men’s tennis schedule for the ITA Regional Championships name, Tuesday-Saturday date window, home designation and Provo listing.
- ITA: Division I Regional Championships for BYU’s Mountain host assignment, Oct. 6-10 dates, official event page, national qualification context and published draw sizes.
- ITA: official Mountain tournament page for draws and results as the organizer publishes them.
- BYU Athletics: 2026 fall-opening results for published Hasler, Schreiner, Goldammer, Wells, Ubri and Peranovic singles and doubles scores.
- BYU Athletics: 2025 Mountain Regional final for Chodur and Schreiner’s doubles title, BYU’s 8-4 doubles record, 11-12 singles record and Goldammer/Schreiner round-of-16 finishes.
- Idaho State: 2026-27 schedule for independent confirmation of the Oct. 6-10 Provo window, TBA time and official ITA event link.
- Utah: 2026-27 men’s tennis schedule for independent confirmation that the Mountain Regional begins Oct. 6 in Provo.
- BYU Sport Nuts: men’s tennis hub, roster, schedule, Sherwood follow guide, Dar Walters follow guide and all-sports index.
